Skip to content

Document rolling and release Kolla image tags - #1062

Merged
berendt merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
docs-kolla-image-tag-namespaces
Aug 26, 2026
Merged

Document rolling and release Kolla image tags#1062
berendt merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
docs-kolla-image-tag-namespaces

Conversation

@jklare

@jklare jklare commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Documents the two Kolla image tag schemes, how to look up the image parameters
and tags of a specific OSISM version, and fixes the security advisory
remediation snippets that cannot be applied as written in a release-namespace
deployment.

Reported in osism/issues#1430.

Problem

The advisories tell operators to pin a rolling tag in
environments/kolla/images.yml:

neutron_server_tag: "2025.1"

A deployment that follows the OSISM 10 release
notes

and sets docker_namespace: kolla/release/2025.1 resolves this to
registry.osism.tech/kolla/release/2025.1/neutron-server:2025.1, which does not
exist. The pull fails with unknown: artifact ... not found.

Both settings are individually correct and documented. The combination is not,
and nothing documented that. Nothing documented either where the tags that can
be set come from, or which image parameters exist in the OSISM version actually
deployed — the guide only linked 002-images-kolla.yml at main.

What was verified, and how

Everything factual below was checked against the registry or the source. Listing
it explicitly so nothing here has to be taken on trust.

Method. All registry facts come from skopeoskopeo list-tags,
skopeo inspect and skopeo copy against docker://registry.osism.tech/....
The Harbor token endpoint and /v2/<repo>/tags/list were not queried
directly with a bearer token. skopeo needs no credentials for these
repositories, is the tool the OSISM stack itself uses (osism sync versions),
and is therefore also what the added documentation shows as the example command,
so every listing below is reproducible with a single command.

1. The two namespaces have disjoint tag sets. skopeo list-tags, re-run on
2026-08-21:

Repository Tags returned
kolla/neutron-server 2024.1, 2024.2, 2025.1, 2025.2
kolla/release/2025.1/neutron-server 26.0.3.20251208, 26.0.3.20260128, 26.0.3.20260328, 26.0.4.20260615, 26.0.6.20260814

2. Why they are disjoint. src/tag-images-with-the-version.py:221 in
container-images-kolla moves release builds into
/kolla/release/<OPENSTACK_VERSION>/ using only the computed
<version>.<build date> tag. The rolling tag is never rewritten into that
namespace, so the split is by construction, not a publishing gap. Introduced in
osism/container-images-kolla#672.

3. The rolling tag carries the OSSA-2026-032 fix. skopeo inspect docker://registry.osism.tech/kolla/neutron-server:2025.1: created 2026-08-21T01:33:57Z, org.opencontainers.image.version = 26.0.6,
de.osism.version = latest. The advisory names 26.0.6 as the fixed Epoxy
version.

4. The release namespace now carries it too, from OSISM 10.2.0 on.
10.2.0/base.yml in osism/release pinned Kolla 0.20260813.0 when the release
was prepared on 2026-08-13 and was bumped to 0.20260814.0 one day later by
osism/release#2665. Extracting
/sbom.yml from osism/kolla-ansible:0.20260814.0 (skopeo copy into a dir:,
then the layer holding it) gives versions.neutron: 26.0.6.20260814, and
skopeo inspect on
kolla/release/2025.1/neutron-server:26.0.6.20260814 reports
org.opencontainers.image.version = 26.0.6. OSISM 10.1.0 pins Kolla
0.20260328.0, from before the advisory, so it is unaffected by this and still
needs the override.

The build and tag names verified here are deliberately not repeated in the
advisory text. Neutron 26.0.6 is not released upstream — PyPI's newest Epoxy
release is 26.0.5 — so naming it as the fixed version would contradict the
affected versions table further up in the same file, which lists 26.0.6 as
proposed and not yet merged. The advisory therefore only states that OSISM
10.2.0 ships the patched images.

Worth flagging separately: the build 10.2.0 originally pinned,
0.20260813.0, contains no neutron images at all — its SBOM lists 120 images
and has no neutron key, where the complete builds list 133 and 60 versions.
With that SBOM, kolla_neutron_version falls back to openstack_version, so
neutron would have resolved to kolla/release/2025.1/neutron-server:2025.1,
a tag that does not exist. osism/release#2665 fixed that as well.

5. Which images each recommended tag covers. Read from
osism/defaults/all/002-images-kolla.yml at main: keystone_tag drives four
images (keystone, keystone-fernet, keystone-ssh, httpd), nova_tag
drives ten, neutron_server_tag and nova_api_tag one each.
nova_libvirt_tag derives from kolla_nova_libvirt_version, not nova_tag;
that is why nova_libvirt is absent from the OSSA-2026-002 block, which the
snippet no longer spells out.

osism/defaults at main also defines neutron_rpc_server_image,
neutron_periodic_worker_image and neutron_ovn_maintenance_worker_image,
which default to neutron_server_image. Those parameters were introduced with
kolla-ansible 2025.2 and do not exist in stable/2025.1 (checked in a clone of
openstack/kolla-ansible), so they cannot apply to any OSISM release and are
not mentioned in the docs.

6. The version lookup chain in the new section. 10.2.0/base.yml pins
defaults_version: v0.20260712.0; that tag exists in osism/defaults and holds
both all/002-images-kolla.yml and all/002-images-ceph.yml, so both links
resolve.

7. Build and lint pass. yarn build succeeds with onBrokenLinks: 'throw';
the new anchor id="rolling-tags-and-release-tags" is generated and the inbound
links resolve. MegaLinter (documentation flavor: markdownlint,
markdown-table-formatter, codespell) reports no findings. The
unsupported file type SVG warnings in the build output are pre-existing and
unrelated.

Changes

  • configuration-guide/openstack/index.md — new Rolling tags and release tags section covering both schemes and the *_image override, which is the
    explanation of tag semantics asked for in the issue, plus a new Image parameters and tags of a specific OSISM version section: osism/release
    10.2.0/base.ymldefaults_version: v0.20260712.0
    002-images-kolla.yml / 002-images-ceph.yml at that tag, with skopeo list-tags examples for the tags of both namespaces.
  • release-notes/osism-10.md — states the tag scheme of the new namespace
    next to the docker_namespace change that introduced it, and warns that it
    holds no rolling tags.
  • OSSA-2026-001, -002, -005, -015, -022, -032 — each rolling-tag snippet
    gains the companion *_image override.
  • OSSA-2026-032 — additionally names OSISM 10.2.0 as the first release that
    ships the patched images, so release-namespace deployments can see that
    upgrading is now enough and the override is no longer required there.
  • OSSA-2026-015, -022, -032, -034 — the tag examples no longer offer
    "2025.2". OSISM ships only the SLURP releases, 2024.1 in OSISM 8, 2024.2 in
    OSISM 9 and 2025.1 in OSISM 10, so it is never the OpenStack release of a
    deployment following these instructions. This is the only change to
    OSSA-2026-034, which is otherwise untouched by this PR, and it is a separate
    commit because it corrects lines that predate this branch.

The advisory snippets list every image the recommended tag covers, since a
partial override leaves the rest of the service pointing at a tag that does not
exist. That is why the nova_tag block in OSSA-2026-002 is ten lines.

Review feedback

Changes made after @janhorstmann's review, all folded into the commits that
introduced the affected lines except the 2025.2 trim:

  • The "only the images actually used in the deployment need to be set" note and
    the nova_libvirt_tag aside are gone from OSSA-2026-002. Overriding an unused
    image has no downside, and the block already lists everything.
  • The neutron_rpc_server_image note is gone from OSSA-2026-032 and from the
    configuration guide, for the 2025.2 reason given in verification item 5. The
    guide now states the general mechanism instead: each image has its own
    *_image, while the *_tag values derive from one service tag.
  • The OSSA-2026-032 release paragraph was shortened to the statement that
    10.2.0 ships the patched images, dropping the Kolla build and image tag, see
    verification item 4.

Not taken: the suggestion to replace the *_image plus *_tag pairs with a
single list of *_image_full entries. It would be more copy-pastable, but it
changes the override style the advisories and the guide use throughout, and
*_image_full is a kolla-ansible role default rather than a parameter
osism/defaults exposes — keystone_httpd_image_full, for one, does not exist
anywhere. Worth discussing separately from this PR.

Judgment calls, for review

These are decisions rather than verified facts, so they are the parts most worth
a second opinion:

  • Placement in OSSA-2026-015 — its snippet is already followed by a
    trust-policy warning, so this one was added after it rather than between the
    snippet and that warning.
  • Remediation scope left untouched — in OSSA-2026-002 the qemu-img path is
    reached in nova-compute, so the advisory's service-wide nova_tag is broader
    than strictly needed. Narrowing a published advisory's remediation seemed out
    of scope for a docs fix, so the scope was kept and made to work.
  • Wording of the kolla namespace as "rolling" — taken from the advisories'
    own existing phrasing ("Using rolling tags, ...") rather than newly coined.
  • The overrides were kept in OSSA-2026-032 rather than replaced by "upgrade
    to 10.2.0", since they remain the only route for 10.1.0 and earlier.

Not addressed here

The neutron-less Kolla build 0.20260813.0 and the fact that the 10.2.0
release entry pointed at it for a day are noted above but not acted on; whether
that needs anything beyond osism/release#2665 is a maintainer call.

Separately, osism sync versions --release <version> looks broken: its defaults
build the SBOM reference as
registry.osism.cloud/kolla/release/sbom:<kolla version>, a repository whose
newest tag is 0.20251130.0, while the current SBOM images live at
registry.osism.tech/kolla/release/<openstack_version>/sbom:<kolla version>.
That belongs in python-osism, not here, and is why the new documentation shows
skopeo list-tags rather than that command.

Open questions from the issue

The reporter asked three questions that this PR answers in the docs, but which
are worth confirming as correct:

  1. docker_namespace: kolla/release/2025.1 is correct and should stay.
  2. It does not need overriding wholesale, only per-image alongside a rolling tag,
    and from OSISM 10.2.0 on not even that for OSSA-2026-032.
  3. Unpinned images are unaffected, because their versions come from the
    versions.yml rendered in the osism/kolla-ansible image from its baked-in
    SBOM.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️MegaLinter analysis: Success with warnings

Descriptor Linter Files Fixed Errors Max errors Warnings Elapsed time
✅ ACTION actionlint 5 0 0 0.06s
✅ JSON jsonlint 4 0 0 0.08s
✅ JSON prettier 4 0 0 0.41s
✅ JSON v8r 4 0 0 9.68s
✅ MARKDOWN markdownlint 168 0 0 2.4s
✅ MARKDOWN markdown-table-formatter 168 0 0 0.38s
✅ REPOSITORY betterleaks yes no no 0.73s
✅ REPOSITORY checkov yes no no 19.46s
✅ REPOSITORY git_diff yes no no 0.06s
✅ REPOSITORY secretlint yes no no 3.51s
✅ REPOSITORY trufflehog yes no no 4.13s
✅ SPELL codespell 178 0 0 0.61s
⚠️ SPELL lychee 178 23 0 16.6s
✅ YAML prettier 6 0 0 0.41s
✅ YAML v8r 6 0 0 6.61s
✅ YAML yamllint 6 0 0 0.57s

Detailed Issues

⚠️ SPELL / lychee - 23 errors
📝 Summary
---------------------
🔍 Total.........1058
🔗 Unique.........807
✅ Successful.....974
⏳ Timeouts.........0
🔀 Redirected.......5
👻 Excluded........61
❓ Unknown..........0
🚫 Errors..........23
⛔ Unsupported.....23

Errors in docs/guides/deploy-guide/metalbox.md
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/metalbox/octavia-export-2025.1.img (at 137:4) | Rejected status code: 503 Service Unavailable
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/metalbox/octavia-export-2025.1.img (at 430:4) | Rejected status code: 503 Service Unavailable
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/metalbox/registry-2025.1-full.tar.bz2 (at 132:4) | Rejected status code: 503 Service Unavailable
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/metalbox/registry-2025.1-full.tar.bz2 (at 415:4) | Rejected status code: 503 Service Unavailable
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/metalbox/registry-stable-full.tar.bz2 (at 134:4) | Error (cached)
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/metalbox/registry-stable-full.tar.bz2 (at 417:4) | Error (cached)
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/metalbox/ubuntu-noble.tar.bz2 (at 129:4) | Error (cached)
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/metalbox/ubuntu-noble.tar.bz2 (at 407:4) | Error (cached)
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/openstack-ironic-images/osism-esp.raw (at 115:6) | Error (cached)
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/openstack-ironic-images/osism-ipa.initramfs (at 111:6) | Error (cached)
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/openstack-ironic-images/osism-ipa.kernel (at 112:6) | Error (cached)
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/openstack-ironic-images/osism-metalbox-image.zip (at 96:4) | Rejected status code: 503 Service Unavailable
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/openstack-ironic-images/osism-node.qcow2 (at 113:6) | Error (cached)
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/openstack-ironic-images/osism-node.qcow2.CHECKSUM (at 114:6) | Error (cached)

Errors in docs/guides/upgrade-guide/metalbox/data-updates.md
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/metalbox/registry-stable-full.tar.bz2 (at 90:4) | Rejected status code: 503 Service Unavailable
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/metalbox/ubuntu-noble.tar.bz2 (at 151:4) | Rejected status code: 503 Service Unavailable
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/openstack-ironic-images/osism-esp.raw (at 57:6) | Rejected status code: 503 Service Unavailable
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/openstack-ironic-images/osism-ipa.initramfs (at 53:6) | Rejected status code: 503 Service Unavailable
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/openstack-ironic-images/osism-ipa.kernel (at 54:6) | Rejected status code: 503 Service Unavailable
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/openstack-ironic-images/osism-node.qcow2 (at 55:6) | Rejected status code: 503 Service Unavailable
[503] https://nbg1.your-objectstorage.com/osism/openstack-ironic-images/osism-node.qcow2.CHECKSUM (at 56:6) | Rejected status code: 503 Service Unavailable

Errors in docs/guides/user-guide/openstack/migration-vmware-esxi.md
[ERROR] https://www.openstack.org/vmware-migration-to-openstack/ (at 20:1) | Connection failed. Check network connectivity and firewall settings

Errors in docs/release-notes/osism-8.md
[ERROR] https://www.openstack.org/software/openstack-caracal (at 223:38) | Connection failed. Check network connectivity and firewall settings

Hint: Followed 5 redirects. You might want to consider replacing redirecting URLs with the resolved URLs. Use verbose mode (`-v`/`-vv`) to see redirection details.

See detailed reports in MegaLinter artifacts

Your project could benefit from a custom flavor, which would allow you to run only the linters you need, and thus improve runtime performances. (Skip this info by defining FLAVOR_SUGGESTIONS: false)

  • Documentation: Custom Flavors
  • Command: npx mega-linter-runner@10.0.0 --custom-flavor-setup --custom-flavor-linters ACTION_ACTIONLINT,JSON_JSONLINT,JSON_V8R,JSON_PRETTIER,MARKDOWN_MARKDOWNLINT,MARKDOWN_MARKDOWN_TABLE_FORMATTER,REPOSITORY_CHECKOV,REPOSITORY_GIT_DIFF,REPOSITORY_BETTERLEAKS,REPOSITORY_SECRETLINT,REPOSITORY_TRUFFLEHOG,SPELL_LYCHEE,SPELL_CODESPELL,YAML_PRETTIER,YAML_YAMLLINT,YAML_V8R

MegaLinter is provided by OX Security
Show us your support by starring ⭐ the repository

@garloff

garloff commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for your extensive write-up!
I need to spend more time studying it in detail.

Before going down that route, I believe there are a few scenarios that users (or testers) might legitimately want to have supported and documented:

  1. Deploy the (images for the) originally released version
  2. Deploy the (images for the) originally released version with one or several cherry-picked (security/bug) fixes. We may reject this as hard to support due to combinatorial explosion in testing. (We might still want to support it technically, as this may be required for testing or for individual customer situations.)
  3. Deploy the (images for the) originally released version with all published maintenance/security/bug fixes for that version.
  4. Deploy the latest and greatest ... This may be something that can not be officially supported ... but is needed for testing purposes then.

I personally consider the scenario 3 as the most relevant and would like it to be fairly easy to achieve.

Do you agree with this list? (Anything I forgot? Anything that should not be on it?)
I can then review the docs w.r.t. those scenarios.
Maybe the tagging approach can be evolved to make things easier? That would be for the backlog then, for now documenting how it currently works is certainly good progress.

@jklare
jklare marked this pull request as ready for review August 21, 2026 16:13
Comment thread docs/appendix/security/ossa-2026-002.md Outdated

See [Rolling tags and release tags](../../guides/configuration-guide/openstack/index.md#rolling-tags-and-release-tags).
:::

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In my opinion it would be less confusing to just specify the list of *_image_full entries, consisting of rolling release namespace, image and tag and just provide a link to the section explaining rolling and release tags. I think the tag could be handled generically by just using {{ openstack_version }}.

Suggested change
Alternatively, you can use [rolling tags](../../guides/configuration-guide/openstack/index.md#rolling-tags-and-release-tags) to override the Keystone container image with a version
that includes the fix. Configure the following in `environments/kolla/images.yml`:
```yaml
keystone_image: "registry.osism.tech/kolla/keystone:{{ openstack_version }}"
keystone_fernet_image: "registry.osism.tech/kolla/keystone-fernet:{{ openstack_version }}"
keystone_ssh_image: "registry.osism.tech/kolla/keystone-ssh:{{ openstack_version }}"
keystone_httpd_image: "registry.osism.tech/kolla/httpd:{{ openstack_version }}"

This way it becomes a copy & pastable solution with the option to dive deeper if you are interested

The same of course applies to all the other advisories

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am a bit unsure here what the recommended path is (since we did not have any documentation for that so far). Personally, I think it would be quite strange to have variable pairs called keystone_fernet_image and keystone_fernet_tag and then write both the image path, and the tag into keystone_fernet_image so that keystone_fernet_tag is silently ignored. Maybe @berendt could advise here which is the preferred style.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's better to keep it like it is.

Comment thread docs/appendix/security/ossa-2026-032.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/appendix/security/ossa-2026-032.md Outdated
@osfrickler osfrickler moved this from New to In review in Human Board Aug 24, 2026
jklare added 4 commits August 25, 2026 17:50
The security advisories recommend pinning a rolling image tag such as
`neutron_server_tag: "2025.1"` in `environments/kolla/images.yml`. In a
deployment that follows the OSISM 10 release notes and sets
`docker_namespace: kolla/release/2025.1`, that override resolves to
`registry.osism.tech/kolla/release/2025.1/neutron-server:2025.1`, which
does not exist, so the pull fails with `unknown: artifact ... not
found`.

The two namespaces on `registry.osism.tech` use disjoint tag schemes.
The `kolla` namespace carries the rolling tags named after an OpenStack
release, currently 2024.1, 2024.2, 2025.1 and 2025.2. The
`kolla/release/<openstack_version>` namespaces carry only immutable
`<project version>.<build date>` tags, produced by the release
retagging in `src/tag-images-with-the-version.py` of
container-images-kolla. A rolling tag therefore never exists in a
release namespace. Neither scheme was documented, and the advisories
did not mention the constraint at all.

Add a "Rolling tags and release tags" section to the OpenStack
configuration guide that describes both schemes and the `*_image`
override that pulls a single image from the `kolla` namespace. Note the
tag scheme in the OSISM 10 release notes, next to the
`docker_namespace` change that introduced it. Extend the affected
advisories, OSSA-2026-001, -002, -005, -015, -022 and -032, with the
matching `*_image` overrides.

Those overrides list every image the recommended tag covers, because a
partial override leaves the remaining images of the service pointing at
a tag that does not exist: `keystone_tag` drives four images and
`nova_tag` drives ten. `nova_libvirt_tag` is derived from
`kolla_nova_libvirt_version` rather than from `nova_tag` and is
therefore left out.

This is a documentation change only. It does not make the OSSA-2026-032
fix available to release deployments: the newest neutron-server tag in
the release namespace is 26.0.4.20260615, while the fix landed on
2026-07-29. Until a new release build is published, those deployments
can only obtain the fix through the rolling tag, which is what the
added guidance now explains how to use.

Reported in osism/issues#1430.

Flagged for security review because it corrects the remediation
instructions of six published advisories, which so far could not be
applied as written by deployments using a release namespace.

SecurityImpact
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5[1m]
Signed-off-by: Jan Klare <klare@osism.tech>
The "Image tags" section of the OpenStack configuration guide links the
list of image parameters from the main branch of osism/defaults. That
branch tracks the current development state and does not necessarily
match the version a deployment runs, so parameters that do not exist
yet in the deployed version, or that were already removed from it,
cannot be told apart from the ones that apply. The section also did not
say where the tags that can actually be set come from, which is the
registry and not a repository.

Add a subsection that walks that lookup for a specific version, with
OSISM 10.2.0 as the example. The base.yml of a release directory in
osism/release pins the version of every OSISM component; for 10.2.0 its
defaults_version parameter pins osism/defaults to v0.20260712.0.
Following that tag, all/002-images-kolla.yml lists the image parameters
of the OpenStack images and all/002-images-ceph.yml those of the Ceph
images, both linked at the pinned tag rather than at main.

Complement this with two `skopeo list-tags` examples for the Neutron
API image, one for the rolling tags in the kolla namespace and one for
the release tags in kolla/release/2025.1, so that the two tag schemes
described in the preceding subsection can be listed per image. No
credentials are required for either listing.

This is a documentation change only.

Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5[1m]
Signed-off-by: Jan Klare <klare@osism.tech>
The advisory states that a fix will be included in upcoming OSISM
releases and leaves the image overrides as the only remediation. That
was accurate when it was written, but OSISM 10.2.0 now ships the
patched images: its entry in the release repository was updated to the
Kolla build 0.20260814.0, in which neutron-server of the
kolla/release/2025.1 namespace is tagged 26.0.6.20260814 and carries
Neutron 26.0.6, the version the upstream advisory names as fixed for
Epoxy. Readers on a release namespace therefore have no way to tell
from the advisory that upgrading is now enough and that the overrides
have become unnecessary.

Name OSISM 10.2.0 as the first release with the patched images and
delimit this against OSISM 10.1.0 and earlier, which pin Kolla builds
from before this advisory (10.1.0 pins 0.20260328.0) and for which the
rolling tags remain the only way to obtain the fix. Which Kolla build
and image tag carry the fix is left out of the advisory text: that the
images of 10.2.0 contain the fix is what a reader needs to know, and
naming Neutron 26.0.6 here would contradict the affected versions
table of this advisory, which lists that version as proposed and not
yet released upstream.

Verified with skopeo against registry.osism.tech: the SBOM baked into
osism/kolla-ansible:0.20260814.0 resolves neutron to 26.0.6.20260814,
and the labels of that image report
org.opencontainers.image.version 26.0.6.

This is a documentation change only, it does not change the
remediation for any version that is still affected.

Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5[1m]
Signed-off-by: Jan Klare <klare@osism.tech>
The tag override examples in OSSA-2026-015, -022, -032 and -034 offer
2025.2 as a possible value of the `*_tag` parameter. OSISM ships only
the SLURP releases of OpenStack, 2024.1 in OSISM 8, 2024.2 in OSISM 9
and 2025.1 in OSISM 10, so 2025.2 is never the OpenStack release of a
deployment that follows these instructions.

The statements about the OpenStack releases the images are built for,
such as the affected versions tables and the note that the downstream
patch was applied to all four Kolla branches, are left untouched. They
describe the container images that are built, not a value an operator
can set.

Reported in the review of #1062.

Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5[1m]
Signed-off-by: Jan Klare <klare@osism.tech>
@jklare
jklare force-pushed the docs-kolla-image-tag-namespaces branch from dd52424 to ad36a00 Compare August 25, 2026 17:53
@jklare

jklare commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks for your extensive write-up! I need to spend more time studying it in detail.

Before going down that route, I believe there are a few scenarios that users (or testers) might legitimately want to have supported and documented:

  1. Deploy the (images for the) originally released version
  2. Deploy the (images for the) originally released version with one or several cherry-picked (security/bug) fixes. We may reject this as hard to support due to combinatorial explosion in testing. (We might still want to support it technically, as this may be required for testing or for individual customer situations.)
  3. Deploy the (images for the) originally released version with all published maintenance/security/bug fixes for that version.
  4. Deploy the latest and greatest ... This may be something that can not be officially supported ... but is needed for testing purposes then.

I personally consider the scenario 3 as the most relevant and would like it to be fairly easy to achieve.

Do you agree with this list? (Anything I forgot? Anything that should not be on it?) I can then review the docs w.r.t. those scenarios. Maybe the tagging approach can be evolved to make things easier? That would be for the backlog then, for now documenting how it currently works is certainly good progress.

I agree, 3. is the most important one here. The big question is, what exactly is "the originally released version". Currently, we target a release process for OSISM, where we regularly do new minor releases within the latest major one.

If you are on OSISM 10 and currently have 10.0.0 deployed you have two options:

  1. You can add a bunch of additional configurations for the images and tags to get all the CVEs fixed and leave the manager_version at 10.0.0.
  2. You can upgrade manager_version to 10.2.0, which will include the correct version tags for all OpenStack services so that you get all the fixes for CVEs known before the release of 10.2.0.

I would generally advise going with option 2 here, so that additional configuration is only needed for urgent fixes and only as long as no new manager_version is released.

@berendt
berendt merged commit dce0137 into main Aug 26, 2026
3 checks passed
@berendt
berendt deleted the docs-kolla-image-tag-namespaces branch August 26, 2026 07:14
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from In review to Done in Human Board Aug 26, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants